Image For Activity Cover
IABP in Cardiogenic Shock: An Open Discussion
Content

Hemometabolic vs. Hemodynamic Cardiogenic Shock – Jacob JentzerMD

Is IABP Appropriate as a First Line or Stabilization Tool? – David Baran, MD, FSCAI

Who Are the Right Patients? Looking at Patients and Timing – Arnold Seto, MD, FSCAI

Q&A with Moderated Panel Discussion

Faculty
David Baran, MD, FSCAI Jacob C. Jentzer, MD
Arnold Seto, MD, MPA, FSCAI    
CME Information

Accreditation Statement
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) is accredited by the 
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

​Credit Designation
SCAI designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

​ABIM MOC
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 medical knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

Successful Completion
Watch the content and complete the evaluation to obtain credit.

Acknowledgement of Commercial Support
This internet enduring activity is derived from a live activity, which was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Getinge. No in-kind commercial support was received.
SCAI's Independent Content
As a provider of continuing medical education through the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), it is the Society’s policy to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its activities. All participating faculty, course directors, planning committee members and staff are required to disclose to SCAI any relevant financial relationships. SCAI identifies relevant conflicts of interest and resolves them before the activity begins.

Planning Process
SCAI activities are developed by the SCAI SHOCK Program Committee prior to and independent of commercial support. Members of the Education Committee reviewed and approved this activity, and those with relevant conflicts of interest recused themselves. Members of SCAI’s Continuing Medical Education Oversight Committee, clinicians in the field of cardiac catheterization and angiography, reviewed all educational materials and verified that the materials are fair, accurate, and free of commercial bias. 

Content Validation Statement
SCAI accepts the following Content Validation Statements and expects all persons involved in its professional education activities to abide by these statements for clinical care recommendations. All clinical and pharmacological recommendations are based on evidence accepted within the medical profession as adequate jurisdiction for their indications and contradictions in patient care. All research referenced to support or justify patient care recommendations conforms to accepted standards of experimental design, data collection and analysis.

SCAI's educational content is free of marketing or sales of products or services. Faculty will not actively promote or sell products or services that serve their professional or financial interests during accredited education. 

SCAI encourages faculty to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Copyright
© 2021-2022 Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). All rights reserved.
Summary
Availability: Retired
Cost : FREE
Credit Offered:
No Credit Offered
Powered By